QB A: 60.8% Comp, 243 yds/g, 79.1 QB Rating

No O-Line to protect him and gets these numbers.

QB B: 59.9% Comp, 247 yds/g, 87.2 QB Rating

Highly regarded, former Super Bowl winning QB with a healthy O-Line.

QB C: 58.1% Comp, 236 yd/g, 78.1 QB Rating

Another QB dealing with a weak, injured O-Line.

The only difference in these QBs is the number of sacks and the TD/INT Ratio.

QB A: Sacked 20 times.

QB B: Sacked 19 times.

QB C: Sacked 28 times.


Which QB had the worst line?


Well QB A And C are Eagles quarterbacks that got hit. QB B is Eli over the course of the season.


What did Nick Foles(A) do wrong if he completed at a higher % than Eli and got hit more in a much fewer amount of games?

Why doesn't he deserve a chance at starter if he performed equal to Vick, who everyone is touting as the starter?


And before anyone else says anything, I want to hear from xnoz

This post was edited by jro1221 on May 5 2013 10:32pm

NFC East sucked as a whole last season

Enjoy the asshole for a few more years.

He's getting his shot for sure.. If anyone thinks otherwise they just don't know, or they are inside the Eagles organization and they already made the decision lol.

because vick is black

In a parallel universe, every QB in the league is named Eli Manning and they all break the passing record every game.

wb

Reading it now


These are numbers from last season obviously correct?

This post was edited by xnozx. on May 5 2013 10:40pm

Haha, been a while since I've talked to you man. How ya been?

Yup

Hectic, but restful now for the most part.