Xnozx - Topic

rdeight8

Member

Posts: 17,905

Joined: Sep 23 2007

Gold: 500.00

#21

May 5 2013 10:59pm

Quote (xnozx. @ May 6 2013 12:56am)

Ok, prove me wrong than.

Find people to back your argument since you want to chime in with an immature comment.

Then*
Currently on my phone, but from what the stats provided show its not even a close argument. I just find it funny that no matter what logic is used for someone's argument you always end up home ring the giants and looping everything back to Eli being the second coming of Christ

Hoos

Member

Posts: 48,478

Joined: Jan 28 2006

Gold: 1,294.38

#22

May 5 2013 11:00pm

Quote (xnozx. @ May 6 2013 12:53am)

You can ask anyone, Eli's pocket presence and footwork is amongst the best. That's widely known.

If you think that ability doesn't mask an inept OL, you're severely mistaken.

he aint no tony romo dawg

xnozx.

Member

Posts: 59,137

Joined: Jan 19 2005

Gold: 26.51

Warn: 10%

#23

May 5 2013 11:01pm

Quote (jro1221 @ May 6 2013 12:57am)

Pocket presence still doesn't change getting hit. Unless you are throwing the ball away the second you get it.

Eli had the fewest hits on him as a QB last year. And I am not saying that your O_line wasn't bad. I know it was, but they provided him with more time still than Vick or Foles had, and even you cannot argue that. Yet Foles and Vick, put up only slightly worse stats than him.

I was just using this as a display to show that Foles should have a chance to start this year. He earned that chance last year by putting up decent numbers performing under duress. Just wanted to use Eli's as a similar statline that would show that Foles has the potential that a lot of others ignore.

Bold 1
Absolutely, most certainly does are kidding? Pocket presence is why Sanchez is such a terrible QB. he has ZERO pocket awareness and terrible footwork. Combine pocket presence and footwork and it goes a long way to becoming a successful NFL QB.

Bold 2
I wasn't arguing that.

xnozx.

Member

Posts: 59,137

Joined: Jan 19 2005

Gold: 26.51

Warn: 10%

#24

May 5 2013 11:02pm

Quote (rdeight8 @ May 6 2013 12:59am)

No, you guys do that. I simply try to state my arguement, you guys are the ones that embellish and make up statements.

You can say I homer all you want but I always admit when I'm wrong and I NEVER make up bs statements to aid my argument, ever.

jro1221

Member

Posts: 30,905

Joined: Feb 18 2007

Gold: 0.00

#25

May 5 2013 11:08pm

I take back my statement about the Giants O-Line being bad last year.

You guys were consistently ranked high last year, by both statistics and analysts.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/OL

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/01/28/ranking-the-2012-offensive-lines/3/ (Ranked 11th)

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2012/10/24/offensive-line-rankings/2/ (Ranked 14th)

xnozx.

Member

Posts: 59,137

Joined: Jan 19 2005

Gold: 26.51

Warn: 10%

#26

May 5 2013 11:15pm

Quote (jro1221 @ May 6 2013 01:08am)

Lol, that's comical but props on the effort of providing proof. I'm not sure what they were watching or how they grade this but for the past two years our offensive line has been atrocious in pass protection and run blocking, even moreso in run blocking though. Ask any Giants fan you know tomorrow then come back and tell me what they said about our O-line the past few seasons.

Gfgrice

Member

Posts: 70,484

Joined: Aug 24 2007

Gold: 0.00

Warn: 30%

#27

May 5 2013 11:23pm

yep stats/pff articles are comical as proofs

but what xnozx has to say is 100% true, and he watches every giants game and therefore we can all believe what he has to say about the giants.

Gilly

Member

Posts: 72,078

Joined: May 31 2008

Gold: 3,570.21

#28

May 5 2013 11:52pm

Quote (rdeight8 @ May 5 2013 11:55pm)

Xnoz logic

Disregard statistics
Homer Giants
?????
Act like you've won the argument