holds the fg?


lets get a headcount, someone commish? we can iron out format scoring etc

maybe require 2-3 years buyin to avoid 1 and done'ers

This post was edited by Bradleyk on Apr 28 2024 08:49pm

Yeah I've thought of the same thing

2 year buy-in up front

1 year buy-in due every following year

Each users responsibility to find a buyer for their team (i.e., pay the 2 year buy-in and assume ownership... at which point the 1 year deposit is returned to the team owner.)

If the team is not sold and the team owner hasn't paid the annual fee, they lose their deposit and the team gets auctioned off (at the minimum price of 1 year buy-in. If somebody were to buy at the minimum price they could turn around and sell the team the following year for 2 year buy in, and effectively extract the deposit of the delinquent owner. If the league is succesful and the team is good, teams may get auctioned off for more than 2x the league buy-in which would be cool)

I've run a 10k fg league the last few years and could pretty easily morph into a keeper.

I would be up for ramping up the buy-in and doing keeper, but if the buy in is 20k fg, and we need a 2 year buy-in initially, idk how many people are willing to shell out 40k and perpetually have 20k sitting for years.

Didn't read but I agree

ever play ER? June has a new dlc.

The DISRESPEKT

sorry it's the name change that tripped me up dawg no disrespekken

Lol its always the damn name changes. Terps ruined this subreddit

I’m not in, we know it won’t work lol

I don't have a lot of faith either, that's why a deposit is needed.

If med is holding the fg and people are paying 2 year buy in, and rebuying every year, there's a lot of incentive to not walk away from the team and to find a buyer if you intend to walk. There's a profit motive in the market if somebody neglects their team, commissioner can auction the team off for minimum bid of 1 year buy in the winning bidder essentially 2x their fg if they win on minimum bid. Neglect would have to be defined in the terms and conditions, and the surrender of the 1 year buy-in / deposit would be agreed to. If it's a league that's running for a couple years with success we could have a waitlist etc..

jsp mods are actually quite good about honoring the terms and conditions, I just observed a scammer accusation where Textbook essentially concluded that by sending fg the user had agreed to the terms and conditions in the original post and had no claim. (Where their claim was asking for a refund of buy-in against the terms and conditions.)

I personally hate parking money and getting no return on it, so I dislike the idea of having a big pool of fg just be dead for perpetuity.. but it would definitely incentivize people to manage appropriately. It just needs to be structured properly.

This post was edited by ZeaLORDeaL on May 4 2024 01:49pm