LOL too true

Ghot, you cannot be this stubborn.
Here I've taken the Valley benchmark out of equation.

Without the Valley results, the 780 OC is 3.38% slower than the titan.
Perhaps we should take the AVP results out, and any other that don't favor the Titan?

And higher OC = Higher temps, which if anything should put the 780 OC at disadvantage as it's more likely to hit the first boost wall.



You created this thread, clearly you found a set of results that favored the Titan and wanted to share, so here we are.


This post was edited by Battleship on Aug 2 2013 06:55pm

and if you look at the AnAndtech bench on the 1st page...you'll see that same...roughly 3% ??

It wasn't for e-peen bro, it was for ppl buying vid cards...it shows the same % difference across the board.

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 2 2013 06:57pm

the only thing i saw in his supposed "titan is better" list is folding.

So titan for folding thread once more.

Ignored :/


Like where did I say...everyone go buy a Titan...this post was to let ppl know that a 780 would do just as well.

/e and WWI's benchmark pic shows the same thing...even on a flat out every last Mhz squeezed out of a GTX 780 :/

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 2 2013 06:59pm

Yet he just acknowledged he read it and took it to heart.

#titanforfolding

#moron

You DO realize that you will never get 100% out of both vid cards..in SLI or CF right? Oh wait...maybe you don't :/

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 2 2013 07:01pm

Ghot, where do you get your information from?

1228/3348 is considered a flat out OC?
Honestly it sounds like you are trying to discredit all evidence of the GTX 780 being as close as it is with the Titan.

Yeah bro, that's why I [posted the benchmarks on page one that show the exact opposite :/

CAN U SHOW ME
A 780BEATING A WCED TITAN
BRO