Quote (winterschapel @ May 10 2013 07:47am)
pork might be a bit more tender than beef i think, but it also goes by cut. in my experiment, both porks from sous vide are significantly more tender (soft) than their pan cooked counterparts. both were also more consistently cooked. we have a shear press in a lab so maybe next time i can quantify it for you

the main reason i went with pork is because i would recognise the pork flavour easier (one of the advantages is never losing the juices of the meat, i think), and that cooking something like a fillet of beef or ribeye seems redundant. same reasoning for tougher cuts of meat, which i usually braise.
on the outside mo
upon your suggestion i might try a skirt/flank steak, no marinade, and see if i can turn it into a fillet

well yeah, the cut will makes a difference; i meant comparing the same cuts.
a ribeye might not need to be cooked sous vide for tenderness, but it will still benefit from being cooked evenly throughout rather than well done moving to medium rare on the inside.
from what ive heard itll be as tender as a fillet but more flavorful.
Quote (acyroma @ May 10 2013 08:13am)
I've had duck breasts cooked sous vide in a restaurant and it wasn't as good as pan fried and then finished in the oven. Maybe it wasn't cooked properly when I tried it sous vide, but it was a pretty noticeable difference. I know it was seared after cooking sous vide, but that's all I know.
depending on how they handled the fat i could see duck breasts not working out as well for sous-vide.