d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Low Level Dueling >
Poll > Wsg And Vigor Charge - Seriously
12323Next
Add Reply New Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
Aug 5 2010 07:11am
its a lame bugabuse and when we pretend to play "legit" or "balanced" or whatever pvp, it does NOT belong here!

nobody needs wsg, nobody wants it - remove it!

and about vigor charge: people can still use libby! but they cannot turn totally invisible for 30sec!
as a compromise: allow foh (max 5 facets +200%lr for opponents)!
who's with me?

at least we should have a discussion about it since many people have the same/similar opinion
people who vote: would be nice if you leave a comment "i voted yes, because..."
i voted yes, because: see first line

This post was edited by harabec on Aug 5 2010 07:22am
Member
Posts: 3,969
Joined: Apr 21 2006
Gold: 16.93
Aug 5 2010 07:15am
yes

100.00% (2 Votes)
no

0.00% (0 Votes)

Poll ended, we have enough votes. kkthx
Member
Posts: 11,336
Joined: Oct 1 2005
Gold: 48.15
Aug 5 2010 07:22am
mld is all about wsg and desynch
Member
Posts: 13,583
Joined: Mar 25 2004
Gold: 47.43
Aug 5 2010 07:24am
I voted no. These shouldn't be banned just because you keep losing.
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
Aug 5 2010 07:27am
Quote (xvmurdacb @ 5 Aug 2010 14:24)
I voted no.  These shouldn't be banned just because you keep losing.

check my duel results^^

Quote (Matroskin @ 5 Aug 2010 14:22)
mld is all about wsg and desynch

no it's not, its about having good & balanced duels which are fun.. dueling an invisible opponent isn't my idea of that, and i'm not the only one as it seems

people who need wsg/vigor charge to win are just too lazy/bad to properly play their character in my opinion
Member
Posts: 29,057
Joined: Aug 3 2005
Gold: 13.37
Aug 5 2010 07:28am
yes because its just stupid bug abusing that can be really overpowered vs some builds. i think vigor charge should be allowed on some builds, like smiters and zealers vs ranged because they are too weak without, not to mention that they dont have same mana than hammerdin for example so they cant desync with it as much.
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
Aug 5 2010 07:29am
Quote (Antichrist- @ 5 Aug 2010 14:28)
yes because its just stupid bug abusing that can be really overpowered vs some builds. i think vigor charge should be allowed on some builds, like smiters and zealers vs ranged because they are too weak without, not to mention that they dont have same mana than hammerdin for example so they cant desync with it as much.


yes totally agree
i have no problem with charger/zealer (or any pala that doesn't use foh or hammer) using vigor charge, but others don't need it

This post was edited by harabec on Aug 5 2010 07:30am
Member
Posts: 873
Joined: Sep 5 2006
Gold: 0.99
Aug 5 2010 07:30am
I voted yes, because long time ago a Libby killed my whole 4on4 team :( :D
..
its no fun duelling an invisible pala whos marked in a house on the map but is actually next to you and is casting hammers. Although I think I can deal with it, its still not what I see as legit pvp.
Member
Posts: 13,583
Joined: Mar 25 2004
Gold: 47.43
Aug 5 2010 07:42am
Oh, looks like this is a euro topic.

More rules, yay!
Member
Posts: 38,991
Joined: Mar 30 2006
Gold: 450.17
Warn: 10%
Aug 5 2010 07:45am
Quote (Antichrist- @ Aug 5 2010 01:28pm)
yes because its just stupid bug abusing that can be really overpowered vs some builds. i think vigor charge should be allowed on some builds, like smiters and zealers vs ranged because they are too weak without, not to mention that they dont have same mana than hammerdin for example so they cant desync with it as much.


yes, lol.

libby morons
Go Back To Low Level Dueling Topic List
12323Next
Add Reply New Topic