Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Sep 12 2014 05:33pm)
So probably bringing this up due to Adrian Peterson news.
There's seem to be a valid case for clear neglect in this case. He used "discipline" that left marks that lasted after a week. There's talk he admitted to being under the influence of alcohol during the spankings. And he's using a belt on a 4 year old. You really think it's discipline to use a belt on a 4 year old?
As far as the topic at hand. There's really no common ground to be had on the issue. A lot of views and opinions on it are based on your own upbringing on it. Even though a lot of studies have been done on it that show it has adverse effects on a kids development potentially.
And if you think some bad apples kids would be reduce because they get "disciplined", then you got no clue. Maybe spanking them would make them even more fucked up. Child development isn't black and white, some kids are stronger than others mentally.
My dogs left marks that lasted months just playing around. I got marks that lasted a week from scratching my arm too hard. Thats *nothing*
And no, he's not using a metal belt, he's using a switch, he even has pictures of himself next to the tree he took it from. And yes, its a long american history of using a switch on a misbehaving child
And yes I think discipline produces better kids. Bullshit biased researchers with an agenda can produce whatever fakery they want. Everyone who has actually grown up and seen the world has seen spoiled children and what they become.
Doctor spock was as wrong a fraud as the freud he loved to quote. And even he acknowledged physical punishment