d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > I Am God's Son
Prev115161718Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 24,094
Joined: Nov 13 2008
Gold: 280.69
May 12 2018 01:14am
https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/04/health/exorcism-doctor/index.html

here is an interesting read...

I see people who have never seen Demonic Attack as strange... I mean they make up all these ideas and fantasies because they haven't seen real hell...
it's not a fun experience... many times it's life and death... but I guarantee you, once you see it for yourself you will understand...

ignorance is bliss my friend... and I wouldn't want to give you kids nightmares... paranormal activity, seances, Ouijia boards, Rituals, Witchcraft, they all bring about negative feelings... and when a person is afflicted it is hard to shake...

whenever these things happen... there is always a million people spectating from their highhorse, claiming the priests are liars, and are hurting these people... but the fact is the priests are just trying to help... God is the real miracle worker
Member
Posts: 17,297
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 12 2018 01:31am
Quote (Chevaucheur @ May 12 2018 09:16am)
Scientific plausibility is something very important in science.

Here are some articles on this subject:
https://nccih.nih.gov/research/blog/plausibility
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/plausibility-in-science-based-medicine/
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0034-89102011000300021&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en

Scientific plausibility is essential for the research to be done in a decent and ethical way.



There is only one universal declaration in bioethics, and it is dated 19 October 2005.

You can find the declaration at this address:
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001798/179844e.pdf

In this statement, scientific plausibility does not appear to be indispensable.

I would like you to criticize this declaration, and try to break this contract with other countries.

http://tof.cx/images/2018/05/12/f794e394138183f771dcc543986127b2.jpg




For trust to be created, there is a need for coherence and relevance in the agreement that is reached.

The declaration of 19 October 2005 lacks coherence and is therefore of limited value.



The mistake you made is that you created a contract that lacks consistency.

We can not give a rendez-vous to an elderly person, for a date 10 years later.

It is a betrayal to forget the limited abilities of our interlocutor.

In the same way, other countries can not be asked to be ethical, even though they do not care about scientific plausibility.



The US is putting itself in a position of weakness and vulnerability, and it hurts.

The US must ensure that the contracts that are created can be respected by other countries.



The US must refuse to submit to contracts that are not respected by the other parties.

Decency wants the US to make the effort to know about the security of their nation.

Americans must refrain from ignoring important things.

It is a very serious sin not to make the effort to protect his person and his community.


It is a very serious sin not to make the effort to protect his person and his community.

It is a very serious sin not to make the effort to protect his person and his community.



I would like you to modify this agreement, or to break it.


Now that I know what you want me to do, I'm going to ask you the most important question...why?

Why do I need to criticize the declaration and break that contract with other countries? What will that truly gain?

Bear in mind that I've read the book of Ecclesiastes and I find time to be a precious commodity. I know that the time I have on this world is very limited so the time that I do have remaining should be carefully spent on worthy causes.

Why do you want this done?
Member
Posts: 9,614
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Gold: 268.15
May 12 2018 01:58am
Quote (CPK001 @ May 12 2018 09:31am)
Now that I know what you want me to do, I'm going to ask you the most important question...why?

Why do I need to criticize the declaration and break that contract with other countries? What will that truly gain?

Bear in mind that I've read the book of Ecclesiastes and I find time to be a precious commodity. I know that the time I have on this world is very limited so the time that I do have remaining should be carefully spent on worthy causes.

Why do you want this done?


I want you to do this to prevent the East from harming the West.

This agreement puts the US in a weak position.

This agreement is of little value, because there can't be ethics if there is not a concern given to scientific plausibility.

This agreement prevents the US from doing full scientific research.

Science is a very sensitive domain, and it has a very strong impact on the military field.

You must defend your freedom of scientific research so that you can continue to be a strong country.



The OSCE is a witness of the importance of science as a military force.



I think that what is done to the OSCE must be strengthened.

And the declaration of 19 October 2005 should be deleted.

The USA must be a strong country.
And this implies that they pay attention to the scientific laws that they adopt
.

The Americans are the only Protestants who really have prudence.



Americans are people who have a lot of decency.

The global society needs Americans.

The global society does not only need Protestantism as it exists in the United Kingdom or Africa.

The world society mainly needs Protestantism as it exists in the USA.



Americans must protect their society.
And this implies that they do not sign bad scientific agreements
.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 12 2018 02:04am
Member
Posts: 9,614
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Gold: 268.15
May 12 2018 02:09am
Only Americans broadcast knowledge around the world.

And that is prudence.

English, Swedish or African do not do this work.



Here is a map of Protestantism in the world:


The global society needs the Protestant American society to exist and be strong.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 12 2018 02:24am
Member
Posts: 9,614
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Gold: 268.15
May 12 2018 03:35am
The OSCE is a witness of the importance of science as a military force.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization_for_Security_and_Co-operation_in_Europe

The CSCE, ancestor of the OSCE was created in 1973, during the Cold War, to appease military tensions between the US and the USSR.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 12 2018 03:38am
Member
Posts: 17,297
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 12 2018 03:52am
Quote (Chevaucheur @ May 12 2018 05:58pm)
I want you to do this to prevent the East from harming the West.

This agreement puts the US in a weak position.

This agreement is of little value, because there can't be ethics if there is not a concern given to scientific plausibility.

This agreement prevents the US from doing full scientific research.

Science is a very sensitive domain, and it has a very strong impact on the military field.

You must defend your freedom of scientific research so that you can continue to be a strong country.



The OSCE is a witness of the importance of science as a military force.

https://image.ibb.co/hqktFd/osce.png


I think that what is done to the OSCE must be strengthened.

And the declaration of 19 October 2005 should be deleted.

The USA must be a strong country.
And this implies that they pay attention to the scientific laws that they adopt
.

The Americans are the only Protestants who really have prudence.



Americans are people who have a lot of decency.

The global society needs Americans.

The global society does not only need Protestantism as it exists in the United Kingdom or Africa.

The world society mainly needs Protestantism as it exists in the USA.



Americans must protect their society.
And this implies that they do not sign bad scientific agreements
.


Just by scanning that pdf, I can tell that, that is a pathetic document. All I see is a bunch of sensitive smart-asses who just waffle on for over 352 of the suckiest pages you could ever have the misfortune to encounter.

Sacrifices must be made for the good of the people. People will suffer but it is for the betterment of humanity.

Romans 8:18-21 - I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us. For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed. For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God.

They fail to see the bigger picture. If 10,000 people suffer now so 1,000,000 people later on can live then so be it. Fate will only choose those who have the capacity to make the hard decisions.

I am all for the advancement of technology and humanity; and against anyone who would dare try to hinder that progress.
Member
Posts: 9,614
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Gold: 268.15
May 12 2018 04:05am
Quote (CPK001 @ May 12 2018 11:52am)
Just by scanning that pdf, I can tell that, that is a pathetic document. All I see is a bunch of sensitive smart-asses who just waffle on for over 352 of the suckiest pages you could ever have the misfortune to encounter.


It is an official UNESCO document, which is hosted on unesco's official website.

This document isn't a "bunch of sensitive smart-asses".

It is an official document of UNESCO.

Your criticism is not clear.

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001798/179844e.pdf

http://unescodoc./UNESCO.ORG/...

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 12 2018 04:07am
Member
Posts: 17,297
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 12 2018 05:15am
Quote (Chevaucheur @ May 12 2018 08:05pm)
It is an official UNESCO document, which is hosted on unesco's official website.

This document isn't a "bunch of sensitive smart-asses".

It is an official document of UNESCO.

Your criticism is not clear.

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001798/179844e.pdf

http://unescodoc./UNESCO.ORG/...


352 pages though? Even reading the first few pages I could tell what the rest of the document would be like.
Member
Posts: 40,833
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
May 12 2018 05:23am
Quote (caswallen @ 12 May 2018 06:42)
if it were simple then why haven't you solved the worlds problems... if you got all the correct answers then wtf have you done about it?

as someone who suffered from Demonic attack, I find you highly offensive... you are oppressing me with your close mindedness


Because I'm not claiming to have the answer to ALL problems. Just one. The problem of whether or not the Christian God exists.

But demonic attacks eh? That is legitimately interesting. Please tell us about your experience. Promise I won't shout you down or judge you for it - I just want to hear about it in your own words. I haven't had the chance to speak to a demoniac before and I would find it fascinating. One of the areas of history I specialise in is Witchcraft and Possession in the Early Modern Period and modern demoniacs could give me a window into the experiences professed by early modern people.

This post was edited by Scaly on May 12 2018 05:25am
Member
Posts: 9,614
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Gold: 268.15
May 12 2018 06:03am
Quote (CPK001 @ May 12 2018 01:15pm)
352 pages though? Even reading the first few pages I could tell what the rest of the document would be like.


If you search for the term "plausibility" in the document, you will see that it only appears once.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 12 2018 06:12am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev115161718Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll