I rely not on faith and wishes but on reason and logic. You are right that I have little faith. Because faith is, much like a penis, pretty great to have but fails to answer any questions satisfactorily... and can make you do some stupid things if you let it guide you.

This post was edited by Scaly on May 11 2018 03:00pm

You can still have reason and logic with faith.

You can have it in spite of it and not apply it to your faith. But the two are not compatible and you are being intellectually dishonest if you are both a sceptic and religious.

wrong, typical close minded idea...

No. It's simple bud - either you apply logic to your faith and no longer believe or you don't and still believe.

Tell me how you solve the problem of evil and I'll attend your award ceremonies. Otherwise - buck up sunshine cos ur talking shit.

Faith and skepticism are mutually exclusive

Scientific plausibility is something very important in science.

Here are some articles on this subject:
https://nccih.nih.gov/research/blog/plausibility
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/plausibility-in-science-based-medicine/
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0034-89102011000300021&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en

Scientific plausibility is essential for the research to be done in a decent and ethical way.



There is only one universal declaration in bioethics, and it is dated 19 October 2005.

You can find the declaration at this address:
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001798/179844e.pdf

In this statement, scientific plausibility does not appear to be indispensable.

I would like you to criticize this declaration, and try to break this contract with other countries.





For trust to be created, there is a need for coherence and relevance in the agreement that is reached.

The declaration of 19 October 2005 lacks coherence and is therefore of limited value.



The mistake you made is that you created a contract that lacks consistency.

We can not give a rendez-vous to an elderly person, for a date 10 years later.

It is a betrayal to forget the limited abilities of our interlocutor.

In the same way, other countries can not be asked to be ethical, even though they do not care about scientific plausibility.



The US is putting itself in a position of weakness and vulnerability, and it hurts.

The US must ensure that the contracts that are created can be respected by other countries.



The US must refuse to submit to contracts that are not respected by the other parties.

Decency wants the US to make the effort to know about the security of their nation.

Americans must refrain from ignoring important things.

It is a very serious sin not to make the effort to protect his person and his community.

It is a very serious sin not to make the effort to protect his person and his community.

It is a very serious sin not to make the effort to protect his person and his community.



I would like you to modify this agreement, or to break it.

you mean, i have many 'eyes' ?
just 1 bro, just 1

It is a very serious sin for one, not to make the effort to protect one's person and one's community.

It is a betrayal for one, to forget the limited abilities of one's interlocutor.

The US is putting itself in a position of weakness and vulnerability, and it's something wrong.

In the name of decency, the US should make the effort to know all there is to know, to protect their country.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 12 2018 12:34am

if it were simple then why haven't you solved the worlds problems... if you got all the correct answers then wtf have you done about it?

as someone who suffered from Demonic attack, I find you highly offensive... you are oppressing me with your close mindedness