Hello,
I will explain my thoughts simply because my English is not very good.

I will take the example of chess.
In chess, people use combinatorics.
They try to anticipate the next moves.

That's what Deep Fritz does.
That's what Garry Kasparov does.



That's what I consider to be moralism (as opposed to empiricism).



I think another strategy is possible, which would categorize the movements, and quantify the victory.

That's what I consider to be empiricism.

Pierre Bottero said: "There is a huge difference between the one who tries to outdo himself and the one who wants to be the best. The first works on him, the second on the others".





In today's global society, moralism is widespread.
I think empiricism is a real strength.

Empiricism is the ability to create rhythm where there was none.

Chinese people love music: they like rhythms and tones.
If they see the force in empiricism, I think they will change their attitude.



You can find the more detailed post in French at this address:
http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=78606358&f=150&p=530836748

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 11 2018 10:35am

your post would be better in the China thread Ghot made, where people still wouldn't read it.

Queen Tash Khatun's aesthetic was, in a word, opulent.

you should seek help, print off your blogs and walk straight into a shrinks office.

What misdeeds?

Iran has uttered and continues to make death threats against many innocent people, including the US and Israel.

To attack innocent people is fascism.

To kill innocent persons is not just murder, it's a crime.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 11 2018 11:13am

Murder is a crime. Attacking innocent people isn't fascism.

A van is not just a car, it's an automobile!

You're right, I'm sorry.
I'm sorry I made a mistake.

You are right, but it is very strange.
Is a murder by self-defense also considered a crime?

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 11 2018 11:19am