I wouldnt be surpised by them doing a "10 reasons why Trump is worse than Kim" article...

meanwhile in reality, the article and reporting suggest nothing even close to the alt-right nutjob assumptions you revel in here, they clearly identified her as influential part of the nk regime, described her presence as calculated political move. no one is praising her or the nk regime...

shows again who the real "fake news" narratives come from...

stealing the show has positive connotations in the English language


sounds positive

This post was edited by majorblood on Feb 11 2018 12:21am

why am i not surprised that our trump collaborators would do anything to keep his attack on all media critical of him alive? clinging to their fake news narratives, blatantly ignoring both the tone as well as the details of an article in order to vilify everyone who ever dared to criticise their dear leader. you guys would have a bright future in politics in north korea...

and no, that description only sounds positive to someone who wants it to. even more so if you put it into back into the context of the article. same with the "stealing the show" phrase, they clearly identify it as snow job (pun intended). and if all that wasn't obvious enough, i wonder how you square that (even in your own alternative reality) with the fact that they compare her to ivanka trump - after all they HATE the trumps, right? oh, and please feel free to point out where they "praise the nk regime"...

This post was edited by fender on Feb 11 2018 01:24am

☑ fictional

you are arguing a strawman again
do you think 'stealing the show' does not have positive connotations in the english language?
can you clearly identify where they say 'snow job' in their article or make a comparison to it?

the article praises her and even attempts to contrast her with her brother

if you don't see
as having a positive note we definitely live in incompatible realities on this

if you replace her name with Michael Obama or Ivanka Trump or any other influential political woman it would easily be seen as positive.

What happens when a generation of “you were oppressed, fuck whitey” becomes 51% of the population?

pretty ironic coming from the original strawman constructor. some idiot claimed the article was "praising" the nk regime and another alternative facts victim endorsed that narrative while fantasising about similarly idiotic and equally fictional headlines.

so when i point out the bs in these claims YOUR reaction is to try to make an article, that is unmistakably critical of nk, into something that "sounds somewhat positive" - IF you just ignore all the context and isolate a particular phrase or passage, to apologise these retarded claims?! do you not realise how desperate and pathetic that is? sorry, but those right wing propaganda narratives make you people sound really dense.

and it's not like there aren't plenty of legitimate reasons to criticise outlets like cnn for - like their massive establishment bias, their corporate hackery, their abandonment of REAL critical journalism out of fear to lose their precious access to the washington elite... but the desperate attempts of the right to spin these absurd narratives in order to attack, vilify, delegitimise, and ultimately silence anyone who dares to criticise their cult leader are beyond ridiculous. again, that's what regimes do you pretend they were "praising" in this article...

This post was edited by fender on Feb 11 2018 03:28am

would be great if you addressed my points, not reading this