http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/14/politics/trump-women-accusers/

Well, for example this. This isn't responsible journalism. This is a smear campaign that a reputable news organization should never run. A plethora of women coming out of the woodwork right at the time when Trump is threatening the establishment candidate? Give me a fucking break, any dolt can see that this is fake and/or is being pushed by his opponents. It's funny that after her won all these allegations magically disappear, it's almost as if it was just a ploy to sway voters before the election

good lord does your mommy feed you everything?
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/
Classified documents presented last week to President Obama and President-elect Trump included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump, multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefings tell CNN.
The allegations were presented in a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-cites-nazi-germany-rejects-dossier-alleged-russia-dealings-n705586
Donald Trump Wasn't Told About Unverified Russia Dossier, Official Says

Officials prepared a two-page summary of the dossier for Trump's briefing Friday at Trump Tower in New York.
Multiple officials say that the summary was included in the material prepared for the briefers, but the senior official told NBC News that the briefing was oral and no actual documents were left with the Trump team in New York. During the briefing, the president-elect was not briefed on the contents of the summary .
"Intel and law enforcement officials agree that none of the investigations have found any conclusive or direct link between Trump and the Russian government period," the senior official said.
According to the senior official, the two-page summary about the unsubstantiated material made available to the briefers was to provide context, should they need it, to draw the distinction for Trump between analyzed intelligence and unvetted "disinformation."

the alphabet media is now in conflict with each other all over fucking Buzzfeed

This post was edited by excellence on Jan 11 2017 02:06pm

CNN published the story about the dossier treating them as legitimate and credible but unverified and applied no critical lens to them. That in and of itself is enough to be wildly irresponsible and unethical.
They used phrasing like "It has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government -- a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States."
But furthermore, they made specific claims that have been refuted by NBC. CNN claimed Trump was briefed on the allegations. NBC says senior officials have confirmed he was not briefed on these unverified reports.

NBC says the CIA only included these dossiers as an example of fake news that should be discredited and ignored in contrast to their real intelligence, and CNN ran ahead and published about the fake documents without checking with their source to understand it was fake, something a cursory inspect made abundantly clear.

of course they didn't call out CNN by name, they're not knuckle-dragging baboons, when they burn their fellows this viciously they do it snidely
Even trump has the decency to say "I'm not going to name names" before he literally points his finger at them and calls them terrible fake news

This post was edited by Goomshill on Jan 11 2017 02:05pm

Any time Trump criticizes a news organization you can be sure they are doing their job.

We've always been at war with Eastasia? Thanks for reminding me

403 examples of Fox News malaise:
http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/issues.php?issue=fox

This post was edited by tommyd323 on Jan 11 2017 02:15pm

I look forward to finding out who's right.

Do you have a source for this? I thought the disagreement was on whether or not Trump was briefed.

one has the two-page synopsis with all the 'salacious details' as a critical component of the briefing, the other has it as used for the purposes of showing 'an example of unverified misinformation'
gee i wonder


it is in the NBC link.