The FBI announced their decision today:
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/286472-fbi-no-charges-against-clintonComey made some comments that put the FBI at odds with some of the other departments: they argue that some emails had classified material in them at the time they were sent (113), which is something no one's proven yet. It's one of the reasons why this is such a contentious (and annoying) issue anyway: because the government has no one agency standard for classification, it causes inter-agency wrangling and bureaucratic squabbling to look like malfeasance. The FBI was able to restore some of the work emails that were accidentally deleted, established that they were not purposefully deleted, and found no evidence of hacking.
Quote (Santara @ Jul 1 2016 02:44pm)
It blows my mind sometimes, the regularity with which you project and simultaneously accuse me of projecting. Cognitive dissonance, yo.
Backpedal all you want on whether my characterization of your errors is incorrect vs misrepresenting, it is neither. You're simply throwing qualifiers at the wall hoping they'll stick and trying to frame the discussion in such a way as to avoid being in error. You were way off, plain and simple, and no amount of bullshit and spin is going to detract from that.
You're still projecting. Of course your characterization is a misrepresentation: a "likely" outcome does not express "the only realm of possibilities," as you characterized in multiple posts. It's exactly as I said: either you don't understand what's being measured or you're misrepresenting, pick one. I guess it could be both?
Who could have ever guessed that all you'd accomplish was demonstrating how embarrassingly little you know about the subject matter?
Oh, I bet I know.