i suppose you're ok with Kim ordering all of the camps to be cleansed once the war begins, and South Korea having an unstoppable rain of cold war missile tech launched at them.

Kim Jung Un's father and grandfather sought to make NK a hedgehog, no one approaches a hedgehog but it doesn't attack anyone. you should get more of your news from Michael Malice and less from the comment section of whatever rag you're getting the "they are gonna shoot a nuke at us" rhetoric from. that's next level stupidity.

I'm not ok with any of this.

But like I said before, no one is attempting to attack NK, so he doesn't need to be a hedgehog. Especially after he sat at the UN and promised he wouldn't.
If he just wants nukes to protect him from future possible attacks from someone other than the US...he should have never agreed to not develop nukes. And he shouldn't have threatened the US at all...that was just stupid.

you can't possibly be this stupid. like no one can possibly believe that without having a brain injury.

NK is a communist state that has morphed into a dictatorship. the the south is South Korea, a close ally and stooge of the UN, US, and japan. North Korea has committed so many human rights atrocities in the past decades since the end of the Korean War that were they not in possession of weapons they'd be taken out by the security council in a heartbeat.

The only reason they haven't been invaded through Kim Sun, Kim Il, and kim Un is because they have had cold war tech missiles staged across the from the neutral zone aimed directly at the south korean capital. they have always been a hedgehog, nuclear arsenal is just their final form. they have always been open about the fact that they will commit genocide both on their own people and the south should the Kims be in threat of losing power. they have propagandized their people in orwellian fashion.

their motive is only to stay in power, threatening the US doesnt harm that, attacking them does. they will not attack us unless the status quo changes, diplomacy doesnt, many other things do.

you really really really need to research. michael malice, libertarian nad fox new contributor (right up your damn alley). look him up, great book and multiple hour long interviews and lectures on youtube.

Too convenient by half. The US has never gone in to a country w/o invite to deal with human rights issues.
The US might politically sanction or similar, but never use force, unless invited.

Kim has to know this. This is just his EXCUSE to violate his UN agreements.

In all this time since the Korean war, no one has bothered them at all. With his information lock down on the NK people, we won't get an invite anyways.


If the US had desired to go in to NK, a bunch of moldy WWII weapons would not have stopped us.


Your arguments SOUND reasonable...but they really aren't.

you mean like when we went into iraq the first time and justified it with kurdish treatment.

you're either trolling, stroking, or need to read before you post. this is pathetic.

no one has enterred there since the war because they've been openly hostile since the war. GOSH SHOCKER ALERT.

read a book you idiot.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 3 2017 06:00pm

Well someone is trolling. That's for sure. :/

i just read a book on the entire north korean situation by michael malice, ive listened to multiple lectures by him, he's a conservative mostly in line with you politically, who extensively researched the country and went there to write a book on it.

but im sure you know better than him and a basic history book. o wait your an old idiot talking out of your ass, again. you're a poor mans widow, like one of the clones that doesnt work.

Yeah, there was a time that I was sometimes "fooled" just because some one wrote a book.
I hope you don't believe Hillary's book.





Not impressed. Looks more like a wannabe comedienne, than anyone important.

He hasn't even been a guest...anywhere important.

it got me interested enough to do a lot of research, there isn't much factual info on the last few decades from the west. that was part of the subject of malice's book. but by all means discredit someone to serve your argument without really doing any research, a bit too old for that type of effort i'd guess.

Hold on there. I didn't discredit Malice...his history has.

On a side note...research only counts if it's from reliable sources. Then you need to take many reliable sources and then take the average of all their claims.
Research =/= just reading or looking up stuff.

The research is only ever as good as it's sources.