Quote (Goomshill @ Jul 18 2012 08:21pm)
The 'truth'?
Were you expecting false flag operations to have a clear cut and definitive source to tell you who did what and whether it was real or fake?
It wouldn't be much of a false flag operation then would it.
The whole crutch is that without enough information to derive any conclusion, you can only punish Israel for sending 2 heavily armed guys into the Mexican congress without permission. Nothing else.
I know it's easy sticking to your conclusion when that is comfortable to you. The only rule in order to be sufficiently sure of anything is observation. Look at the world, and report what you see.
There are a number of answers that could fit the question:'Why were those two men there that day with that amount of weaponry'. Such as: They were there to protect a Mexican ally from getting assassinated. Or this, taken from another website:
Quote
"The wire stories say the men work for a Mexican company called Private Security Systems Development; that the company's lawyer says the men (both former members of Israel's military; one a naturalized Mexican citizen) have permits for their pistols; that the men were outside the House of Representatives and on their way to a meeting to try to sell their company's security services... the "nine grenades" was a novelty cigarette lighter; that the "sugar industry" workers were a bunch of farmers having a Sit-In outside the government building; that said sugar farmers were annoyed by the men taking photos of the area, which would be necessary if they were selling private security services to officials who worked there; and that the "bomb" consisted of some cables in a briefcase one of the men carried."
Yes, your conclusion is a possible one. These others are too. But they wouldn't fit your view of Israel.