d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Boy Scouts Reaffirm Bigotry > Sad
Prev15678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jul 18 2012 12:23pm
Quote (Matao @ Jul 18 2012 10:15am)
we know you've lost the argument , when you have to interpret " touching cocks " , not as 2 cocks touching ( which was the clear meaning )


Christ, you're really trying hard to defend yourself.

You said "nothing could be manlier" when referring to "sword fighting." Most people do not think dick on dick is manly and no one would say that it is the manliest thing to do. However, you could make an argument that actual sword fighting is the manliest thing to do because of the strength, agility, and endurance needed to succeed. It is also quite dangerous.

If you really thought that dick on dick was manly, you would have flat out said that "there is nothing manlier than docking." However, I don't think you meant that...given that a lot of stuff goes over your head, it is much more likely that you failed to grasp the sexual reference.

Honestly, I really don't want to talk about dicks so if it makes you feel better I will let you win.
Member
Posts: 3,657
Joined: Aug 26 2008
Gold: 437.68
Jul 18 2012 12:24pm
Quote (Matao @ Jul 18 2012 02:20pm)
ummm , actually it does
something cant be said to be feminine , if no females do it , let alone a majority of females ....


Didn't you say English was your first language?

You can be a man that does feminine things, or a woman that does masculine things. You could do feminine things and not have to be a woman or do masculine things without being a man.
Member
Posts: 31,209
Joined: Sep 26 2008
Gold: 0.00
Jul 18 2012 02:26pm
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 18 2012 10:23am)
Christ, you're really trying hard to defend yourself.

You said "nothing could be manlier" when referring to "sword fighting."  Most people do not think dick on dick is manly and no one would say that it is the manliest thing to do.  However, you could make an argument that actual sword fighting is the manliest thing to do because of the strength, agility, and endurance needed to succeed.  It is also quite dangerous.

If you really thought that dick on dick was manly, you would have flat out said that "there is nothing manlier than docking."  However, I don't think you meant that...given that a lot of stuff goes over your head, it is much more likely that you failed to grasp the sexual reference.

Honestly, I really don't want to talk about dicks so if it makes you feel better I will let you win.


You ever had a dick fight with a 14 inch cock? Shit's dangerous, bro. Women love a man who loves danger.
Member
Posts: 37,613
Joined: May 3 2007
Gold: 119,903.34
Jul 18 2012 03:38pm


Straight is the new gay.

Member
Posts: 3,657
Joined: Aug 26 2008
Gold: 437.68
Jul 18 2012 06:59pm
Quote (bitg_pj @ Jul 17 2012 03:18pm)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48211027#.UAWtL7RST2Q

NEW YORK — After a confidential two-year review, the Boy Scouts of America on Tuesday emphatically reaffirmed its policy of excluding gays, ruling out any changes despite relentless protest campaigns by some critics.

An 11-member special committee, formed discreetly by top Scout leaders in 2010, "came to the conclusion that this policy is absolutely the best policy for the Boy Scouts," the organization' national spokesman, Deron Smith, told The Associated Press.
Smith said the committee, comprised of professional scout executives and adult volunteers, was unanimous in its conclusion — preserving a long-standing policy that was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2000 and has remained controversial ever since.
As a result of the committee's decision, the Scouts' national executive board will take no further action on a recently submitted resolution asking for reconsideration of the membership policy.
The Scouts' chief executive, Bob Mazzuca, contended that most Scout families support the policy, which applies to both leaders and Scouts.
"The vast majority of the parents of youth we serve value their right to address issues of same-sex orientation within their family, with spiritual advisers and at the appropriate time and in the right setting," Mazzuca said. "We fully understand that no single policy will accommodate the many diverse views among our membership or society."
The president of the largest U.S. gay-rights group, Chad Griffin of the Human Rights Campaign, depicted the Scouts' decision as "a missed opportunity of colossal proportions."
Advertise | AdChoices


"With the country moving toward inclusion, the leaders of the Boy Scouts of America have instead sent a message to young people that only some of them are valued," he said. "They've chosen to teach division and intolerance."
The Scouts did not identify the members of the special committee that studied the issue, but said in a statement that they represented "a diversity of perspectives and opinions."
"The review included forthright and candid conversation and extensive research and evaluations — both from within Scouting and from outside of the organization," the statement said.
The announcement suggests that hurdles may be high for a couple of members of the national executive board — Ernst & Young CEO James Turley and AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson — who have recently indicated they would try to work from within to change the policy. Both of their companies have been commended by gay-rights groups for gay-friendly employment policies.
Stephenson is on track to become president of the Scouts' national board in 2014, and will likely face continued pressure from gay-rights groups to try to end the exclusion policy. Asked for comment on Tuesday about the Scouts' decision to keep the policy, AT&T did not refer to Stephenson's situation specifically.
"We don't agree with every policy of every organization we support, nor would we expect them to agree with us on everything," the company said. "Our belief is that change at any organization must come from within to be successful and sustainable."
A statement from the executive committee of the Scouts' national executive board alluded to the Turley-Stephenson developments.
"Scouting believes that good people can personally disagree on this topic and still work together to achieve the life-changing benefits to youth through Scouting," the statement said. "While not all board members may personally agree with this policy, and may choose a different direction for their own organizations, BSA leadership agrees this is the best policy for the organization."
Since 2000, the Boy Scouts have been targeted with numerous protest campaigns and run afoul of some local nondiscrimination laws because of the membership policy.
One ongoing protest campaign involves Jennifer Tyrrell, the Ohio mother of a 7-year-old Cub Scout who was ousted as a Scout den mother because she is lesbian.
Change.org, an online forum supporting activist causes, says more than 300,000 people have signed its petition urging the Scouts to reinstate Tyrrell and abandon the exclusion policy. The petition is to be delivered to the Scouts' national headquarters in Irving, Texas, on Wednesday.


It seems they've made a judgement that a majority of people would agree with. There is a survey on MSN.com that ask if this was the right decision, and 60% say yes, 35% say no, and 5% are not sure.
Member
Posts: 42,313
Joined: Apr 2 2008
Gold: 90.65
Warn: 50%
Jul 18 2012 07:19pm
Quote (xXAn0nym0usXx @ Jul 19 2012 06:24am)
Didn't you say English was your first language?

You can be a man that does feminine things, or a woman that does masculine things. You could do feminine things and not have to be a woman or do masculine things without being a man.


really , you're questioning my ability to handle english ?
once again , no matter if a male or female does something , that action cannot be said to be feminine if no females do it

feel free to show how women touch their cocks , and ill concede its a feminine thing .....
Member
Posts: 3,657
Joined: Aug 26 2008
Gold: 437.68
Jul 18 2012 07:43pm
Quote (Matao @ Jul 18 2012 09:19pm)
really , you're questioning my ability to handle english ?
once again , no matter if a male or female does something , that action cannot be said to be feminine if no females do it

feel free to show how women touch their cocks , and ill concede its a feminine thing .....


We never claimed it to be feminine...didn't see that anywhere. Just because an act is not masculine doesn't make it feminine.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 18 2012 09:37pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZLBJXsFOYo&feature=g-all-f

seems relevant and I was pretty touched by it.
Member
Posts: 8,329
Joined: Dec 1 2010
Gold: 600.00
Jul 19 2012 09:43am
The BSA, formed in the early part of the 1900's, can be credited with teaching many young men how to survive and endure hardships
Just a few years later, many of these young men went on to win the first world war,

there is no doubt that homesexuality has existed since time immemorial
but, enduring flaming homosexuality is no way to educate anyone for survival or overcoming hardships
which is the most valuable thing that can be taught to any young person, male or female

This post was edited by TheHouseOfDon on Jul 19 2012 09:44am
Member
Posts: 37,613
Joined: May 3 2007
Gold: 119,903.34
Jul 19 2012 10:43am
Quote (TheHouseOfDon @ Jul 19 2012 11:43am)
The BSA, formed in the early part of the 1900's, can be credited with teaching many young men how to survive and endure hardships
Just a few years later, many of these young men went on to win the first world war,

there is no doubt that homesexuality has existed since time immemorial
but, enduring flaming homosexuality is no way to educate anyone for survival or overcoming hardships
which is the most valuable thing that can be taught to any young person, male or female


Because we all know gays are just a bunch of pussies who can't withstand anything and are useless to society.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll