Once again, WHERE is THIS taken OUT OF CONTEXT???

*Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to the whole creation. 16 He that believes and is baptised shall be saved; but he that disbelieves shall be condemned. 17 Believers will be given the power to perform miracles; in my name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; 18 they will pick up serpents; and when they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover.”

Now, here is an interesting piece of information:

In the most ancient manuscripts, Mark 16 ends at verse 8! 9-20 is missing. These last 11 verses were added in the 10th century, because the Gospel according to Mark, which was the first Gospel ever written (and then again 65 years after Jesus, when all the disciples were already dead), doesn't mention the resurrection, nor does it mention the ascension of Jesus Christ.

Thus, apart from the last 2 points, we have a dilemma here:

1-Admit that the Bible has been altered, thus corrupted.
2-Take the poison test to prove you are a true Christian believer.
3-Refuse to take the poison test, thus proving you are not a true Christian Believer!

And believe me, there is NO EXCUSE out of this! In my experience, I have encountered lots of missionaries and regular Christians who try (in vain) and make up excuses like: “You are tempting God”, or “These miracles were only meant for the disciples”, or “the disciples already performed these miracles, and so did Paul when he was bitten by a snake”...

However, ALL OF THESE EXCUSES are already refuted by Jesus who CLEARLY SAYS: “believers” (all those who are baptised etc.) will be able to perform these miracles”, thus, there is truly NO WAY OUT OF THIS!

Case Closed.

PS I will keep hammering you with this until you admit that you are wrong and your fake religion is just that: FAKE!!!

Exactly because we use science and LOGIC, we deny the Bible (most of it, at least) as the "word of God"

Quick question/refutation:

How the F*** did the earth come into existence THREE DAYS BEFORE THE SUN???

If you understood the purpose of a miracle (which you obviously do not) you would understand. Again, it is taken out of context because that was all fulfilled later on in scripture. To not read the ENTIRE N.T. and point out one verse is the definition of out of context. You are not even trying anymore..

LOL!!! What miracle??? In all my years of studying Comparative Religion, I haven't see a SINGLE Christian perform ANY of these miracles. And AGAIN, ***NOTHING IS TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT***, because ALL of the ***CONTEXT** is quoted here. Just FACE FACTS, CHRISTIAN. Your religion self-exposed itself for what it is: FAKE~!~!~!

PS I have read ALL of your BS Book; I have 26 (!) versions of the Bible at home, and 4 extra New Testaments.

What miracle? The entire text you quoted is based on miracles...

I have given you a clear rebuttal and all you want to do is write in caps and repeat yourself over and over (even though your questions have been answered numerous times). "Those who have ears let them listen."

I am AWAITING for your so-called "Evidence" since the beginning of this thread, but "surprisingly", none will come forth

Carl Sagan wrote better stuff than both of those books. You should read him.

GAHAHAHAHA