that's not demonising
neither in the fox story nor in the linked story was anything about there being statements like 'guns kill' or the like and even the spokeswoman of the 'Responsible Citizens of California' did not claim that they were demonising guns

Trying to prevent children from exercising their fundamental constitutional rights when they become adults is demonizing. He clearly thinks guns and gun owners are bad or else he wouldn't be trying to prevent children from becoming gun owners when they grow up.

This post was edited by SwaziSpring on Jun 10 2013 09:53am

...does the buy back include all thumbs and index fingers - pew pew pew !

No, because they don't have telescoping stocks or barrel shrouds.

This post was edited by SwaziSpring on Jun 10 2013 09:55am

look his opinion is spelt out and however you twist and turn it, it is far from demonising
or do you use this word for any disagreement anyone has with anything?

are you demonising the school principal?

yes, and we have 2 hunting shops on the 10 mil stretch of highway between where i live and the next town to the north.

He's clearly demonizing firearms, why else would he do this? Think about it, if he thought firearms and responsible gun ownership were positive (or even neutral) attributes, then why would he try to prevent children from growing up to be gun owners?

...au contraire mon frère - with elbow at the side for close in killing or arm extended for long distance shots .

"Guns are great tools and more citizens should exercise their right to bear arms, therefore I'm going to do everything in my power to prevent future generations from becoming gun owners! Long live the Second Amendment!"

I don't think that's what was going through the principal's head...

they live in the middle of a city and will likely never have any interest in showing the respect for guns that a capable owner should have.