Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 17 2017 08:14am)
Thats surprising to find real evidence. I thought the whole Uranium headline was an Alex Jones schtick.
Does this have any potential to blow up?
We previously knew that Bill/Hillary received millions from Russian businessmen who were involved in the Uranium One deal, which was controversial just for being such a giveaway to Russia, and we knew Robert Mueller personally flew to Moscow to hand deliver a sample of Uranium that was confiscated from Georgia. That was about the extent of all we knew prior to this scoop. Enough to
suggest that maybe something untowards was occurring, because conspicuous amounts of money changed hands and Russians were getting such a lucrative market.
What we learned now is that those same Russians had been involved in kickbacks with businessmen worth millions, and the FBI knew about it and did nothing to prosecute them or alert regulators prior to the deal, then suspiciously made the entire thing disappear so silently that politicians and regulators were unaware it even existed. That's what the article reveals
So that completely changes the context of the Hillary, who was involved in signing off on the deal, receiving such huge amounts of money from people we know were involved in bribery, kickbacks, racketeering, money laundering, etc. But the main controversy being exposed is that the FBI sat on the investigation, allowing the deal to go ahead, then quashed it. Under normal circumstances, exposing a massive bribery scandal in the nuclear sector would have been a huge achievement for the FBI. When we know they had proof from an informant and oodles of documents, its hard to imagine an innocent scenario where the FBI said nothing to regulators let alone prosecuting the case, going public, anything. And we can't really know who in the FBI was involved with calling the shots: It spanned long enough to be overseen by Mueller, McCabe, Rosenstein & Comey.