not saying that there are no other possibilities or that i wouldn't prefer another solution
but on purpose i posted only those two options, if you don't like it NULL your vote
the current developments put each of those two options on the table

re potentially continued assad involvement: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/08/syrian-rebels-react-coolly-peace-conference
yes, the usa was against any further assad involvement but caved in to russian ideas

re potential al qaida supporting islamist government: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/08/free-syrian-army-rebels-defect-islamist-group
seems not everything is going by plan for the western countries

Null, neither option is acceptable.

...null vote since " whatever is best for Israel " is the only option for which I would cast a vote .

maybe - but what are you going to do if one of the two comes about?

you think your friend julia will invade syria to change it then?

Israel rather than the united states?
I consider israel to be a terrorist state in and of itself.


The us would likely drone strike it like it does pakistan.

This post was edited by Lifebane99 on May 9 2013 05:05am

...Israel is the best , last hope for keeping Iran's nuclear weapons aspirations from being fulfilled . When they draw a red line they can be counted on to back it up .

No matter who they trample in the process.

wonder what will happen if the pml-n wins the election this weekend, sharif wants to withdraw from the 'war on terror'
so any drone strike by the usa on pakistani territory after that would be an act of aggression

...Israel is neither imperialistic nor an aggressor .

They stole australian passports and used them to assassinate plo leaders.